PortfoliosLab logo
ENB vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ENB and ^GSPC is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ENB vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enbridge Inc. (ENB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ENB:

1.76

^GSPC:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

ENB:

2.26

^GSPC:

1.07

Omega Ratio

ENB:

1.31

^GSPC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

ENB:

1.78

^GSPC:

0.70

Martin Ratio

ENB:

9.40

^GSPC:

2.69

Ulcer Index

ENB:

3.05%

^GSPC:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

ENB:

16.75%

^GSPC:

19.64%

Max Drawdown

ENB:

-46.35%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

ENB:

-2.67%

^GSPC:

-3.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENB achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ENB has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 4.86%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.


ENB

YTD

9.11%

1M

3.01%

6M

9.09%

1Y

29.26%

5Y*

15.20%

10Y*

4.86%

^GSPC

YTD

0.60%

1M

9.64%

6M

-0.54%

1Y

11.47%

5Y*

15.67%

10Y*

10.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ENB vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ENB is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ENB is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ENB is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ENB is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ENB is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ENB is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ENB vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enbridge Inc. (ENB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ENB Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENB and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

ENB vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENB drawdown since its inception was -46.35%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENB and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ENB vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Enbridge Inc. (ENB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.82% and 6.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...